OpenSponsorship
OpenSponsorship
Athletes & Creators
Case Studies
Blog
Login
Sign Up
OpenSponsorship
OpenSponsorship
  • About
  • Pricing
  • Profiles
  • Categories
  • Case Studies
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Referral
  • Knowledge
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Help
Featured in:
Sport Business Journal
Sportico
Sports Pro
Forbes
Bloomberg
Cnbc
OpenSponsorship Corp.© Copyright 2026 All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
  1. Home
  2. Search Profiles
  3. DeAndre Hopkins
DeAndre Hopkins profile image

Sponsor DeAndre Hopkins

United States
Athlete
American Football
National
Reach
High
Response Rate

About DeAndre Hopkins — NFL american Football athlete

Why you should sponsor me for your next influencer campaign?

 NFL wide receiver for the Kansas City Chiefs. Drafted by the Houston Texans with the 27th overall pick in the first round of the 2013 NFL Draft on April 25, 2013.Signed by the Texans on July 22, 2013. HONORS: 2013 PFWA All-Rookie Team 2013 Texans Rookie of the Year NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month (Sept. 2013) AFC Offensive Player of the Week (Week 6, 2015) 2015 Pro Bowl 2015 AP NFL All-Pro Second Team CAREER: Ranks third in franchise history with 4,487 yards receiving, fourth with 23 receiving touchdowns, and fourth with 317 receptions Currently the Texans all-time leader in yards per reception at 14.2 Has 13 100-yard games in his career, which is second-most in franchise history and ties Andre Johnson (13 from 2003-06) for the most 100-yard receiving games in the first four years of a player’s career in franchise history Extended his streak of consecutive regular season games started to 64, which ranks second among all active NFL wide receivers, and has caught a pass in all 64 games played Owns the third-most career receiving yards (201) in Texans postseason history Passed WR Andre Johnson (3,953 from 2003-06) for the most receiving yards by a Texans player in the first four seasons of his career, vs. Detroit (10/30/16) Passed Andre Johnson (311 from 2003-06) for the most receptions (312) in the first four years of a player’s career in Texans history, at Tennessee (1/1/17) His 11 receptions and 136 receiving yards in the playoffs are the fourth-highest totals in Texans postseason history At 23 years, 169 days old, became the third-youngest player in NFL history to reach 200 career receptions and 3,000 career receiving yards, behind only WR Larry Fitzgerald (23 years, 108 days) and WR David Boston (23 years, 126 days) Became the third wide receiver in NFL history at age 23-or-younger with 1,400 receiving yards and 11 receiving touchdowns in a season (Issac Bruce, Randy Moss) Became the first player in NFL history with at least nine catches and 145 receiving yards in three consecutive games (Weeks 4-6, 2015) Passed WR Andre Johnson for the most receptions (239), receiving yards (3,533), receiving touchdowns (19) and 100-yard receiving games (11) in a player’s first three seasons in franchise history Set a franchise record for the most receiving touchdowns in a single season (10) in 2015, surpassing WR Andre Johnson’s previous record of nine in 2009 The 25th player in NFL history to amass 2,000 yards receiving through his first two seasons Became the second player in franchise history to eclipse the 1,000-yard mark in 2014 (WR Andre Johnson 2004, 06, 2008-10, 2012-13). Accomplished the feat vs. Tennessee (11/30/14) in the 12th game of the season Reached 1,000 career yards receiving in his 19th game Reached 2,000 career yards receiving in his 31st game. The second youngest (22 years, 198 days) player in NFL history to reach 2,000 yards Became the fastest player in team history to reach 3,000 receiving yards, doing so in his 42nd career game. The previous record was held by Andre Johnson (48 games) Reached 100 career catches in his 27th game Became the fastest player in team history to reach 200 receptions, doing so in his 42nd career game. The previous record was held by WR Andre Johnson (43 games) Became the first player in team history to accumulate 1,000 receiving yards in the first 10 games of a season (2015) Second player under the age of 24 to amass 3,500 career receiving yards (Randy Moss) Had a career-high 238 yards vs. Tennessee (11/30/14), which was the fourth 200-yard receiving game in franchise history. Averaged 26.4 yards per reception, which was the highest single-game average for a player with at least five receptions in franchise history His six 100-yard games in 2015 tied for the second-most such games in a season in franchise history Had a streak of four consecutive 100-yard receiving games from Week 3 to 6 in 2015, which is tied for the longest in franchise history Became the second player in franchise history to record a 100-catch season in 2015 Had 81 receptions through 11 games in 2015, which was the most by any player 23-or-younger in NFL history In 2015, set single-season career highs in receptions (111), receiving yards (1,521), receiving touchdowns (11) and 100-yard receiving games (six) in 2015. Ranked third in the NFL in receptions and receiving yards and tied for seventh in receiving touchdowns Finished the 2015 regular season with the third-most receptions (111), fourth-most receiving yards (1,521) and the most receiving touchdowns (11) in a single season in franchise history 2016 (Houston 16/16, 2/2): Finished tied for second in the NFL in third-down receptions (28), tied for 24th in receptions (78) and 29th in receiving yards (954) Led the team in receptions, receiving yards and tied for the lead in touchdowns Finished tied for the team lead with five receptions for 54 yards and a touchdown in the season opener vs. Chicago (9/11) Scored on a 23-yard touchdown pass in the second quarter, marking his 20th career touchdown reception and third straight season opener (2014-16) with a touchdown, vs. Chicago (9/11) Also recorded his fourth career touchdown in Week 1 games, which passes former Texans WR Andre Johnson for the most in team history, vs. Chicago (9/11) Led the team with seven receptions for 113 yards and a touchdown, which marked his 12th career 100-yard receiving performance, vs. Kansas City (9/18) Led the team with a season-high nine receptions, his most in a single game since Week 6 of the 2015 season, for 71 yards vs. Indianapolis (10/16) in Week 6 Finished second on the team with four receptions for a team-leading 44 yards vs. Detroit (10/30) in Week 8 Passed Andre Johnson (3,953 from 2003-06) for the most receiving yards by a Texans player in the first four seasons of his career, vs. Detroit (10/30) Surpassed 4,000 receiving yards for his career with a team-high five receptions for 48 yards at Jacksonville (11/13) in Week 10 Finished second on the team with five receptions for 58 yards at Oakland (11/21) in Week 11 Led the team with five receptions for 70 yards, averaging 14.0 yards per catch, vs. San Diego (11/27) in Week 12 Finished with three receptions for 58 yards, including a 44-yard touchdown grab in the fourth quarter that marked his longest reception of the season, at Green Bay (12/4) in Week 13 Led the team with eight receptions for 87 yards, as he surpassed 300 receptions for his career, vs. Jacksonville (12/18) in Week 15 Totaled three receptions for a team-leading 43 receiving yards vs. Cincinnati (12/24) Recorded seven receptions for a season-high 123 yards, marking his second 100-yard game of the season, at Tennessee (1/1/17) in Week 17 Led the team with five receptions for 67 yards and his first career postseason touchdown vs. Oakland (1/7/17) in the AFC Wild Card round Posted team highs of six receptions for 65 yards at New England (1/14/17) in the AFC Divisional round 2015 (Houston 16/16, 1/1): Recorded 98 receiving yards and two receiving touchdowns on nine receptions vs. Kan- sas City (9/13) Scored 14 total points (two receiving touchdowns, one two-point conversion), which is the second-highest single-game total by a wide receiver in team history Led both teams with nine receptions for 98 yards (10.9 avg.) and two touchdowns (9/13) Caught a 4-yard touchdown pass from QB Brian Hoyer vs. KC (9/13) Caught a touchdown pass in his third consecutive home opener (2013-15) Passed Arian Foster (2,041) for the fourth-most career receiving yards in team history Finished with five receptions for 53 yards at Carolina (9/20) Caught a 5-yard TD pass from QB Ryan Mallett in the first quarter vs. Tampa Bay (9/27) Led the team with eight receptions for 101 yards (12.6 avg.) and a touchdown (9/27) Had three receiving touchdowns in the first three games, which tied for the most by a Texans player through the first three games of a season Tied Jacoby Jones (11) for the seventh-most career touchdown receptions in team history Recorded 157 receiving yards with nine receptions at Atlanta (10/4) Posted back-to-back 100-yard receiving games for the first time in his career (Weeks 3-4) Led the team with a career-high 11 catches for 169 yards and posted his first career game with 10-or-more receptions vs. Indianapolis (10/8) His 42 receptions and 578 receiving yards were the most through the first five games of a season in Texans history His seven receptions in the first half vs. Indianapolis (10/8) tied for the fourth-most in the first half of a game in franchise history Caught 10 passes for 148 yards and two touchdowns at Jacksonville (10/18) Recorded his fourth consecutive 100-yard receiving game at Jacksonville (10/18), which ties the franchise record (Andre Johnson, 2008) Became the first player in NFL history with at least nine catches and 145 receiving yards in three consecutive games (Weeks 4-6) Had the 2nd most receptions (52) and 4th most yards (726) through six games in NFL history Second player in team history with back-to-back games with 10 catches Tied Corey Bradford (five) for the most receiving touchdowns in the first six games of a season in Texans history Passed Jabar Gaffney (171) for the fifth-most career receptions in team history Passed Steve Slaton (2,643) for the sixth-most career scrimmage yards in team history Scored on a 9-yard reception from QB Brian Hoyer in the 4th quarter at Jacksonville (10/18) Also scored on a 26-yard pass from Hoyer in the fourth quarter at Jacksonville (10/18) Passed Andre Johnson (35 in 2006) for the second-most receptions in a single October in Texans history. Finished the month with 36 receptions for 524 yards and two touchdowns. His receiving yards totals also ranked as the second-most in October in team history Caught six passes for 50 yards in the game at Miami (10/25) Ended a streak of consecutive 100-yard receiving games at four, which tied the franchise record (Weeks 3-6) Led the team with eight receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown vs. Tennessee (11/1) Passed Andre Johnson (2,806) for the most receiving yards in a player’s first three seasons in franchise history Caught a 21-yard touchdown pass from QB Brian Hoyer in the first quarter vs. Tennessee (11/1) to give the team a 7-3 lead Caught five passes for 57 yards and a touchdown at Cincinnati (11/16) Set a single-season career-high in touchdown receptions, surpassing his previous high of six in 2014 Passed Arian Foster (14) for the fifth-most career receiving touchdowns in Texans history Led the team with five catches for 118 yards (23.6 avg.) and two touchdowns vs. NYJ (11/22) Scored a 61-yard receiving touchdown in the second quarter, the second-longest touchdown reception of his career (11/22) Scored again on a 20-yard pass in the third quarter to give the team a 24-10 lead (11/22) At 23 years, 169 days old, became the third-youngest player in NFL history to reach 200 career receptions and 3,000 career receiving yards, behind only Larry Fitzgerald (23 years, 108 days) and David Boston (23 years, 126 days) Became the fastest player in team history to reach 200 receptions, doing so in his 42nd career game. The previous record was held by Andre Johnson (43 games) Became the fastest player in team history to reach 3,000 receiving yards, doing so in his 42nd career game. The previous record was held by Andre Johnson (48 games) Became the first player in team history to accumulate 1,000 receiving yards in the first 10 games of a season Notched his 10th career 100-yard receiving game, passing Andre Johnson (9) for the most 100-yard receiving games in a player’s first three seasons in team history Tied Owen Daniels (4) for the second-most career multiple-touchdown games in Texans history Tied Andre Johnson (3 in 2009) for the most multiple-touchdown games in a single season in team history Caught five passes for 36 yards in the game vs. New Orleans (11/29) Passed Andre Johnson (208) for the most receptions in a player’s first three seasons in team history His 81 receptions this season were the most by any player 23-or-younger through 11 team games in NFL history, according to Elias Set a single-season career-high in receptions, surpassing his previous best of 76 in 2014 Caught five passes for 88 yards and a touchdown at Buffalo (12/6) Scored on a 29-yard pass from QB Brian Hoyer in the fourth quarter to tie the game at 21 at Buffalo (12/6) Caught three passes for 52 yards (17.3 avg.), including a long of 40 yards, vs. New England (12/13) Set a single-season career-high in receiving yards, surpassing his previous high of 1,210 receiving yards in 2014 Led the team with eight receptions for 94 yards at Indianapolis (12/20) Led the team with seven receptions for 117 yards, including a long reception of 44 yards, and a touchdown at Tennessee (12/27) With his third reception of the game in the second quarter, became the second player in franchise history to record a 100-catch season Passed Andre Johnson (103 in 2006) for the fourth-most receptions in a single season in team history Passed Andre Johnson (1,407 in 2013) for the fourth-most receiving yards in a single sea- son in Texans history Scored his 11th touchdown of the season and 19th of his career on a 15-yard reception from QB Brandon Weeden in the third quarter at Tennessee (12/27), which is a franchise record for the most receiving touchdowns in a single season Increased his season totals to 104 receptions for 1,432 yards and 11 touchdowns Logged his sixth 100-yard game of the season, which is tied for the second-most such games in a season in franchise history Became just the third wide receiver in NFL history at age 23-or-younger with 1,400 receiving yards and 11 receiving touchdowns in a season (Issac Bruce, Randy Moss) Led the team with seven receptions for 89 yards, including a long of 20 yards vs. Jackson- ville (1/3/16) Finished the regular season with the third-most receptions (111), fourth-most receiving yards (1,521) and the most receiving touchdowns (11) in a single season in franchise history Extended his streak of consecutive regular season games started to 48, which ranks second among all active NFL wide receivers Caught a pass in his 48th straight regular season game In his first career playoff start, led the team with six receptions for 69 yards in Wild Card Game vs. Kansas City (1/9/16) His receiving yardage total ranks as the sixth-highest mark in a postseason game in Texans history, while his reception total ranks seventh 2014 (Houston 16/16): Named a Pro Bowl alternate after becoming the second player in franchise history to eclipse the 1,000-yard mark. Finished his second NFL season with 76 catches for 1,210 yards and six touchdowns Hauled in a career long 76-yard touchdown in the second quarter in a win over Washington (9/7). Finished the game with 4 receptions for 89 yards. Scored a 12-yard touchdown and finished with 22 yards against Oakland (9/14) Registered a six-catch, 116-yard performance and went over the 1,000-yard mark for his career against the New York Giants (9/21) in Week 3. Recorded the second 100-yard game of his career Set a career high for touchdowns in a season (3) when he caught a 35-yard touchdown pass against Buffalo (9/28) in Week 4. Finished the game with five catches for 64 yards Led the team with six receptions for 63 yards at Dallas (10/5) in Week 5 Posted his third career game with 100 yards receiving, catching six passes for 108 yards at Pittsburgh (10/20) in Week 7 Moved into eighth place on the franchise’s yards receiving list with five receptions for 95 yards at Tennessee (10/26) in Week 8. Entered the game with 1,276 yards receiving and passed Domanick Williams (1,276) and Joel Dreessen (1,323) Recorded his third 100-yard receiving game of the season and fourth of his career vs. Philadelphia (11/2) in Week 9. Caught six passes for 115 yards and a touchdown and tied Owen Daniels for the second-most 100-yard receiving games in franchise history with four. Recorded Houston’s fourth takeaway of the game, recovering LB DeMeco Ryans’ fumble at the Philadelphia 7-yard line in the fourth quarter Caught four passes for 80 yards with a long of 41 at Cleveland (11/16) in Week 11 Caught his 100th career pass and passed his single-season career high (802 yards) in Week 12 vs. Cincinnati. Finished with five catches for 39 yards. Had career-highs of 238 yards receiving, two touchdowns receiving and nine receptions. vs. Tennessee (11/30) in Week 13. It was the fourth 200-yard receiving game and second highest total in franchise history. Averaged 26.4 yards per reception, the highest single-game average for a player with at least five receptions in franchise history. Tied a franchise single-game record with four receptions of 25-plus yards. Became the second player in franchise history to eclipse the 1,000-yard mark in franchise history. Had 117 yards receiving in the first half and 121 in the second half, the first time in his career he had over 100 yards in a single half Made four catches for 49 yards at Jacksonville (12/7) in Week 14. Also recovered an offensive fumble to keep a drive alive Led all receivers with five receptions for 77 yards at Indianapolis (12/14) in Week 15 Caught five passes for 38 yards vs. Baltimore (12/21). Became the fifth player in franchise history with more than 2,000 receiving yards and the second youngest (22 years, 198 days) player in NFL history to reach 2,000 yards receiving. Became the 25th player in NFL history with 2,000 yards receiving through his first two seasons 2013 (Houston 16/16): Started all 16 games at wide receiver and finished the season with 52 receptions for 802 yards (15.4 avg.), ranking second in both categories among rookies in franchise history to Andre Johnson’s 66 receptions for 976 yards in 2003 Earned a spot on the PFWA All-Rookie Team and was voted the Texans Rookie of the Year by teammates Caught at least one pass in all 16 games Named NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month in September after finishing the month with 20 receptions for 270 yards (13.5 avg.) and a touchdown Made his first career start at wide receiver in his NFL debut and recorded five receptions for 66 yards (13.2 avg.) at San Diego (9/9) in Week 1 Recorded seven receptions for 117 yards (16.7 avg.) and the game-winning touchdown in overtime vs. Tennessee (9/15) to become the youngest player in NFL history to score the game-winning touchdown in overtime at 21 years and 101 days Had the second-most yards receiving ever by a Texans rookie vs. Tennessee in Week 2, (Andre Johnson, 122 at Buffalo, 11/16/03) and tied for the second-most receptions by a rookie in franchise history Recorded a game-high six receptions for 60 yards at Baltimore (9/22) in Week 3 Recorded three receptions for 76 yards (25.3 avg.) and a touchdown at Kansas City (10/20) in Week 7 Recorded a game-high six receptions for 69 yards (11.5 avg.) at Arizona (11/10) Caught two passes for 77 yards (38.5 avg.), including a career-long and franchise-long reception by a rookie 66-yarder vs. New England (12/1) in Week 13 COLLEGE: Appeared in 39 games, starting 32 contests for the Clemson Tigers Had 206 receptions for 3,020 yards (14.7 avg) and 27 touchdowns, adding 32 yards on a pair of kickoff returns and 82 yards on 12 punt returns (6.8 avg), along with recording three tackles (2 solos) to amass 3,134 all-purpose yards, an average of 80.4 yards per game The only player in Clemson history with multiple 100-yard receiving performances in bowl games (105 vs. South Florida in the 2010 Meineke Car Care Bowl; 107 vs. West Virginia in the 2011/12 Orange Bowl; 191 yards vs. Louisiana State in the 2012 Chick-fil-A Bowl), as he tallied 32 receptions for 403 yards and three touchdowns in three postseason appearances His 206 receptions rank seventh in Atlantic Coast Conference history and second on the school career list, topped by only Aaron Kelly (232; 2005-08), as they are the only Tigers to ever catch 200 passes for the university His 3,020 receiving yards are the sixth-highest total by an ACC player and set a school record, breaking the previous mark of 2,733 yards by Aaron Kelly Was the sixth player from an ACC institution to gain 3,000 yards receiving in a career, joining Conner Vernon of Duke (3,749; 2009-12), Peter Warrick of Florida State (3,517; 1996-99), Torry Holt of North Carolina State (3,379; 1995-98), Clarkston Hines of Duke (3,318; 1986-89) and Jerricho Cotchery of North Carolina State (3,119; 2000-03) His 27 touchdown grabs tied Herman Moore of Virginia (1988-90) for eighth on the ACC all-time record chart, as it also set a school record Majored in community recreation, sport and camp management major

Overview

🎂34
|
👨Male
📍Kansas CityMissouriUnited States

Clemson University

United States

Pre-Packaged Projects

Frequently asked questions

Sign up for free now to unlock more profile features

Demographics
Demographics

Demographics

See more info on the age, location and gender on the profile's audience

Recent News
Recent News

Recent News

See more of the profile's relevance in the media

Talking about
Talking about

Talking about

See the profile's most common talking points from social media

Reviews
Reviews

Reviews

See the profile's reviews and ratings on past deals

Sign up to see more

Promote your brand and sponsor DeAndre Hopkins today!

1
Choose me

Choose me

Review my profile and stats to see if I am the right fit for your campaign.

2
Create a proposal

Create a proposal

Send me a proposal detailing your objectives and campaign needs.

3
Set deliverables

Set deliverables

Specify the exact marketing tasks and deliverables you want completed.

4
See ROI

See ROI

Track performance to measure the results and return on your investment.

Sign up and send DeAndre Hopkins a proposal or connect with +25,000 athletes. Set your marketing deliverables, have athletes execute them and watch the return multiply.

Nano vs Micro vs Mega Influencers: What 1,527 Creator Campaigns Reveal About Cost and ROI

Nano vs Micro vs Mega Influencers: What 1,527 Creator Campaigns Reveal About Cost and ROI

<p><em>Every influencer marketing article tells you the same thing: micro-influencers are better value. Almost none of them show you the receipts. So we pulled ours.</em></p> <p>We analyzed <strong>1,527 completed, paid creator deliverables</strong> from real campaigns that ran on OpenSponsorship between <strong>January 2025 and June 2026</strong> — every one a genuine brand paying a genuine creator, with tracked performance attached. Not a survey. Not self-reported rate cards. Actual money, actual posts, actual results.</p> <p>Some of what we found matches the conventional wisdom. Some of it flatly contradicts it — including one finding that surprised us enough that we double-checked the query twice.</p> <h2>The short version</h2> <ul> <li><strong>Nano influencers (under 10K followers) cost a median of $134 per deliverable</strong> and generate <strong>20x more views per follower</strong> than mega influencers.</li> <li><strong>But nano influencers do not deliver the cheapest cost per view.</strong> Mega influencers do — roughly 2x cheaper. This is the opposite of what most guides claim.</li> <li><strong>Nano and micro creators do win decisively on cost per engagement</strong> — about $3.05–$3.11, versus $5.00 for mega and $7.07 for the mid tier.</li> <li><strong>The 50K–250K follower tier is a dead zone</strong> — the worst cost per view <em>and</em> the worst cost per engagement of any tier we measured.</li> <li><strong>Deals over $7,500 are the least efficient and the most volatile</strong> of any spend band.</li> </ul> <h2>How we measured it</h2> <p>A benchmark is only as good as its definitions, so here are ours.</p> <p>We took every deliverable marked complete, from deals with a status of "Accepted," created between 1 January 2025 and 30 June 2026. We required a tracked view count above 100 and a recorded fee of at least $50 — this strips out test records and product-only placeholders that would otherwise distort the maths.</p> <p>That left <strong>1,527 deliverables</strong> for the pricing analysis and <strong>1,502</strong> for the follower-tier analysis (a handful of creator records lack a follower count).</p> <p>We report <strong>medians, not averages</strong>. Influencer performance is famously long-tailed — a single viral post can drag an average somewhere useless. The median tells you what actually happens on a typical campaign, which is what you're budgeting for.</p> <p>Two metrics do the work here:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Cost per view (CPV)</strong> — what you paid, divided by views delivered. This is your reach efficiency.</li> <li><strong>Cost per engagement (CPE)</strong> — what you paid, divided by likes, comments, shares and saves combined. This is your <em>action</em> efficiency.</li> </ul> <p>We deliberately do not report engagement rate as a percentage of reach. Reach data is incomplete across the dataset, and a rate calculated on a missing or tiny denominator produces nonsense figures — we've seen "engagement rates" above 70% in raw data, which obviously means the denominator is broken, not that the creator is a genius. Engagement per view is the honest version of that metric, and it's what we use below.</p> <h2>Finding 1: What each creator tier actually costs</h2> <p>First, the number everyone actually wants: the price of admission.</p> <table style="width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:20px 0;"> <thead> <tr style="background-color:#064250;color:#ffffff;"> <th style="text-align:left;padding:10px;">Creator tier</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Campaigns</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Median cost per deliverable</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Median views</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Nano</strong> (under 10K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">146</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$134</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">1,115</td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Micro</strong> (10K–50K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">349</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$150</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">989</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Mid</strong> (50K–250K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">513</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$417</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">2,606</td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Macro</strong> (250K–1M)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">441</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$517</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">6,974</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Mega</strong> (1M+)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">53</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$2,727</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">20,123</td></tr> </tbody> </table> <p>The first thing to notice is how <em>low</em> the entry point is. A nano influencer campaign runs a median of <strong>$134</strong>. A micro campaign, $150. You can run twenty nano creators for the price of one mega creator and still have change.</p> <p>The second thing: <strong>mega influencers are not as expensive as the industry mythology suggests</strong>. A median of $2,727 per deliverable is a real number, but it is not the $50,000 figure that gets thrown around. Those headline fees exist, but they are not the typical transaction.</p> <h2>Finding 2: The cost-per-view result nobody expects</h2> <p>Here is where the conventional wisdom breaks.</p> <table style="width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:20px 0;"> <thead> <tr style="background-color:#064250;color:#ffffff;"> <th style="text-align:left;padding:10px;">Creator tier</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Median cost per view</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Views per follower</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Nano</strong> (under 10K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.13</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>0.199</strong></td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Micro</strong> (10K–50K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.14</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">0.046</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Mid</strong> (50K–250K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.19</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">0.020</td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Macro</strong> (250K–1M)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.10</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">0.015</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Mega</strong> (1M+)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>$0.07</strong></td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">0.011</td></tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>If you are buying reach, big creators are cheaper.</strong> Mega influencers delivered views at roughly 7 cents each — about half the cost of a nano influencer's 13 cents. Macro creators came in at 10 cents.</p> <p>This runs directly against the standard claim that small creators are the better buy. On raw reach economics, they simply aren't. Scale has real efficiency, and pretending otherwise doesn't survive contact with the data.</p> <p>But look at the right-hand column, because it's the other half of the story. <strong>Nano influencers generated views equal to 19.9% of their follower count. Mega influencers managed 1.1%.</strong> That's an <strong>18x difference</strong> in how far a creator's content travels relative to the size of their audience.</p> <p>Put plainly: a nano creator with 5,000 followers routinely does numbers that a follower count alone would never predict. Their content escapes their audience. A mega creator's largely doesn't — it reaches a fraction of the people who already follow them.</p> <h2>Finding 3: On engagement, the small creators win — clearly</h2> <p>Views are not the point. Almost nobody runs a creator campaign because they want people to <em>look</em> at something. They want a comment, a save, a share, a click, a purchase.</p> <p>So we ran the same analysis on cost per engagement.</p> <table style="width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:20px 0;"> <thead> <tr style="background-color:#064250;color:#ffffff;"> <th style="text-align:left;padding:10px;">Creator tier</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Campaigns</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Median cost per engagement</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Engagement per view</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Nano</strong> (under 10K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">131</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$3.11</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>4.6%</strong></td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Micro</strong> (10K–50K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">281</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>$3.05</strong></td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">4.3%</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Mid</strong> (50K–250K)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">439</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>$7.07</strong></td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">2.9%</td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Macro</strong> (250K–1M)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">400</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$4.39</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">2.6%</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>Mega</strong> (1M+)</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">53</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$5.00</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">3.5%</td></tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Micro influencers buy engagement at $3.05. Nano at $3.11. Mega at $5.00. The mid tier at $7.07.</strong></p> <p>So the micro-influencer thesis is real — it was just always described sloppily. Small creators are not cheaper at buying eyeballs. They are <strong>roughly 40% cheaper at buying actions</strong>, and their audiences engage nearly twice as hard per view (4.6% versus 2.6% for macro).</p> <p>That distinction matters enormously for your brief. Awareness campaign? The maths favours a bigger creator. Trying to drive trial, sign-ups, comments, saves, or anything resembling intent? The small creators are the efficient buy, and it isn't close.</p> <figure style="margin:28px 0;"> <img src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/opensponsorship/profile/8e729925-e0d7-49e0-a4df-b9be1681fcec.png" alt="A barbecue creator on the OpenSponsorship roster - creator marketing now reaches far beyond sport into food, wellness and lifestyle niches" style="max-width:100%;height:auto;border-radius:6px;" /> <figcaption style="font-size:14px;color:#555;margin-top:8px;"><em>Niche fit beat follower count in every cut of our data. Creators booked inside the subject they already post about consistently outperformed those booked outside their lane.</em></figcaption> </figure> <h2>Finding 4: The 50K–250K dead zone</h2> <p>This is the finding we didn't expect, and the one we'd encourage you to act on fastest.</p> <p>The mid tier — creators with 50,000 to 250,000 followers — posted the <strong>worst cost per view of any tier ($0.19)</strong> and the <strong>worst cost per engagement of any tier ($7.07)</strong>. Simultaneously. Across 513 campaigns, which makes it our second-largest sample and therefore not a fluke.</p> <p>They are caught in the middle. They have started charging like established creators — a median $417 per deliverable, triple the nano rate — but they have not yet acquired the distribution that makes macro and mega creators efficient at reach. And they have already lost the intimacy that makes nano and micro creators efficient at engagement.</p> <p>They are too expensive to be cheap and too small to be efficient. If you are paying mid-tier rates, this is the single most likely place your budget is leaking.</p> <p>We'd flag one honest caveat: this tier is where a lot of "safe" booking happens. The 50K–250K creator looks credible in a deck. It has a real audience, a tidy grid, a plausible media kit. It <em>feels</em> like the responsible choice. The data says it's the expensive one.</p> <h2>Finding 5: Big deals are volatile, not just inefficient</h2> <p>We also cut the data by what was spent per deliverable, ignoring follower count entirely.</p> <table style="width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:20px 0;"> <thead> <tr style="background-color:#064250;color:#ffffff;"> <th style="text-align:left;padding:10px;">Spend per deliverable</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Campaigns</th> <th style="text-align:right;padding:10px;">Median cost per view</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">Under $500</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">957</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>$0.10</strong></td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$500 – $1,000</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">271</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.22</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$1,000 – $2,500</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">206</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.22</td></tr> <tr style="background-color:#f4f7f6;"><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$2,500 – $7,500</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">78</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">$0.24</td></tr> <tr><td style="padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">Over $7,500</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;">15</td><td style="text-align:right;padding:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;"><strong>$0.41</strong></td></tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Deals over $7,500 cost <strong>4x more per view</strong> than deals under $500. But the median understates the real problem, which is <strong>variance</strong>.</p> <p>Within that top band, the 25th percentile came in at a superb <strong>$0.065 per view</strong> — and the 75th percentile at <strong>$1.18</strong>. That is an eighteen-fold spread inside a single spend band. Some big deals are the best money you'll spend all year. Others cost more than twenty times what a sub-$500 campaign costs for the same view.</p> <p>Small campaigns aren't just cheaper. They're <em>predictable</em>. A big deal is a bet; a portfolio of small ones is a plan. Note that this band holds only 15 campaigns — the direction is consistent, but treat the precise figure as indicative rather than settled.</p> <h2>What we'd actually tell you to do</h2> <p><strong>Don't spend less. Spend it differently.</strong> This is not an argument for cutting influencer budgets — it's an argument about allocation. The same money, distributed differently, buys measurably more.</p> <ol> <li><strong>Match the tier to the job.</strong> Reach and awareness: go bigger, the CPV maths supports it. Engagement, trial, or conversion: go small, where you're buying actions 40% cheaper.</li> <li><strong>Interrogate every mid-tier booking.</strong> The 50K–250K band is our worst performer on both metrics. If you're booking there, make sure it's for a specific reason — a genuine audience fit — and not because the follower count looked respectable.</li> <li><strong>Treat one big deal as a bet, not a plan.</strong> If you're spending over $7,500 on a single deliverable, understand you're buying variance. Balance it with a portfolio that isn't.</li> <li><strong>Book creators inside the subject they already talk about.</strong> Across our data, the campaigns that missed were consistently creators booked outside their lane. Niche fit beat follower count every time we looked.</li> <li><strong>Re-book your winners.</strong> Creators booked more than once outperformed their own first campaign. Familiarity with a product shows up in the content.</li> </ol> <h2>Caveats, honestly</h2> <p>Any benchmark that doesn't tell you its weaknesses isn't a benchmark, it's marketing. Ours:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Fees reflect cash paid, and exclude the value of gifted product.</strong> Where a campaign included product as part of the compensation, true cost is higher than stated — which means the cheaper tiers are, if anything, flattered here.</li> <li><strong>Follower tiers use current follower counts</strong>, not the count at the time of posting. Fast-growing creators may sit in a higher tier than they occupied when the campaign ran.</li> <li><strong>The mega tier (53 campaigns) and the over-$7,500 band (15 campaigns) are small samples.</strong> They're directionally consistent, but they carry less weight than the nano, micro and mid figures.</li> <li><strong>This is our data, not the industry's.</strong> It reflects the brands, categories and creators that work with us — heavily weighted toward sports, wellness, food, and lifestyle. Your category may behave differently.</li> <li><strong>Views accumulate.</strong> Figures were pulled in July 2026; posts continue to gather views after measurement, which makes these numbers conservative.</li> </ul> <h2>Frequently asked questions</h2> <h3>How much does a nano influencer cost?</h3> <p>In our data, a median of <strong>$134 per deliverable</strong>. Nano influencers — creators with under 10,000 followers — are the cheapest entry point in creator marketing by a wide margin, costing roughly 5% of what a mega influencer charges.</p> <h3>Are micro influencers worth it?</h3> <p>For engagement, yes, decisively. Micro influencers (10K–50K followers) delivered engagement at <strong>$3.05 each</strong> versus $5.00 for mega influencers and $7.07 for the mid tier — roughly 40% cheaper. For pure reach, no: larger creators deliver views more cheaply.</p> <h3>What is a good cost per view for influencer marketing?</h3> <p>Across 1,527 campaigns our overall median sat between <strong>$0.10 and $0.24 per view</strong>, depending on spend band. Anything under about $0.15 is strong. Over $0.40 and you should be asking what you're paying for.</p> <h3>Do nano influencers get more engagement?</h3> <p>Yes. Nano creators saw <strong>4.6% of viewers engage</strong>, compared with 2.6% for macro creators — roughly 1.8x higher. They also generate views equal to <strong>19.9% of their follower count</strong>, versus 1.1% for mega influencers.</p> <h3>Is it better to hire one big influencer or several small ones?</h3> <p>It depends on the goal. One large creator is cheaper per view and better for awareness. Several small creators are cheaper per engagement, far more predictable, and better for driving action. For most performance-oriented briefs, the portfolio wins.</p> <h2>Related reading</h2> <ul> <li>Working with athletes specifically? See our breakdown of <a href="https://opensponsorship.com/blog/how-much-does-athlete-sponsorship-cost">how much athlete sponsorship costs</a> — the same pricing question, applied to sport.</li> <li>For the wider picture on where creator and athlete marketing is heading, read the <a href="https://opensponsorship.com/learn-more/state-of-athlete-marketing-2027">State of Athlete Marketing report</a>.</li> <li>For a worked example of a real campaign built around cultural moments, see our <a href="https://opensponsorship.com/blog/america-250-brand-activation-playbook">brand activation playbook</a>.</li> </ul> <h2>Work with creators who actually perform</h2> <p>OpenSponsorship is an end-to-end tech-enabled agency connecting brands with more than 15,000 athletes and creators — across every sport, and a long way beyond it. Recipe developers, longevity and wellness creators, comedians, pitmasters, and Olympians all sit on the same roster.</p> <p>Every number in this study comes from campaigns that ran on our platform, which means we can tell you what a creator in your category is likely to cost and likely to deliver before you commit a budget to it.</p> <p><a href="https://meetings.hubspot.com/ishveen/marketing-emails-2025"><strong>Book a call to talk through your creator strategy →</strong></a></p> <p><em>Methodology: 1,527 completed paid deliverables from Accepted deals created between 1 January 2025 and 30 June 2026, each with a tracked view count above 100 and a recorded fee of $50 or more. Medians reported throughout. Data pulled July 2026. Study by OpenSponsorship.</em></p>

July 15, 2026

Ingredient Branding Done Right: How Immunotec Made Glutathione Mainstream

Ingredient Branding Done Right: How Immunotec Made Glutathione Mainstream

Glutathione has become one of the most talked-about molecules in wellness — the “master antioxidant” that shows up in podcasts, longevity conversations, and the supplement aisle alike. But behind that mainstream moment is a brand that has spent decades making glutathione credible: Immunotec. This is the story of how OpenSponsorship helped Immunotec turn that scientific authority into everyday consumer demand — and a real-world example of what ingredient branding looks like when it’s done right.

July 13, 2026

OpenSponsorship Releases World Cup Brand Activation Data as FIFA 2026 Kicks Off

OpenSponsorship Releases World Cup Brand Activation Data as FIFA 2026 Kicks Off

Press Release · New York, NY

The world's largest athlete marketing platform reports 277 million views from soccer creators in the last eight weeks, with 1,552 bookable soccer athletes ready for brand activation across 15+ countries. Clients including Walmart and USA Today are already activating ahead of kickoff.

OpenSponsorship, the world's largest athlete marketing platform backed by Serena Williams and David Blitzer, today released proprietary data showing the scale of the creator opportunity around the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which kicks off Thursday, June 11th in North America. With brands including Walmart and USA Today already activating soccer creator campaigns through the platform, OpenSponsorship is positioned as the go-to partner for brands looking to win the biggest sports marketing moment of the decade.

277M
soccer creator views, last 8 weeks
1,552
bookable soccer athletes, 15+ countries
276
viral posts over 100K views, just 86 athletes

The platform's soccer roster has generated 277 million views in the last eight weeks alone, with 276 viral posts clearing 100,000 views across just 86 athletes. OpenSponsorship has 1,552 publicly listed and bookable soccer athletes across 15+ countries, including 893 in the United States, alongside athletes from the UK, Mexico, Canada, Spain, Brazil, France, Nigeria, and more.

Brands that can't sign elite players can still reach their audience

With 48 nations competing in the largest World Cup in history, brands face a common challenge: the biggest names are either off limits or out of budget. OpenSponsorship's data shows that mid-tier and creator talent routinely out-reaches their follower counts by 50 to 100x — giving brands access to the same passionate fan audiences at a fraction of the cost of global stars.

“The World Cup is the biggest commercial moment in sports marketing history, and the brands that win it will not be the ones who waited for the tournament to start. Our soccer athletes have already generated 277 million views in the last two months. The audience is engaged, the creators are ready, and the window to activate at the best rates closes when kickoff happens.” — Ishveen Jolly, Founder & CEO, OpenSponsorship
Walmart and USA Today: what World Cup activation actually delivers

OpenSponsorship's recent Walmart Soccer Saturday campaign demonstrates what's possible when brands activate the right soccer creators. The campaign — which featured AA9Skillz, Brittany Wilson, Matty Farias, Sean Garnier, and others — generated the following:

11.6M
total campaign views
4.5%
engagement — ~2x industry benchmark

USA Today is also activating soccer creator campaigns through OpenSponsorship ahead of the World Cup, leveraging the platform's roster of 1,552 bookable soccer athletes to reach highly engaged audiences across the US, Canada, and Mexico — the three host nations for the 2026 tournament.

“When creators genuinely love a sport and an event, it shows in the content. The Walmart campaign worked because the athletes were authentic soccer fans first and brand partners second. That authenticity is exactly what drives the kind of engagement numbers brands cannot get from traditional advertising.” — Ishveen Jolly, Founder & CEO, OpenSponsorship
The World Cup activation window

OpenSponsorship's data shows a clear opportunity curve for World Cup brand activation. Athletes are available now at pre-tournament rates, with demand and pricing expected to rise sharply once the group stage begins June 11th.

  • Kickoff — June 11: the group stage is the viral window, where trending athletes are still affordable before bidding wars begin.
  • The Final — July 19, MetLife Stadium: the highest-profile moment for brands that have already built creator relationships.

Brands that lock in creator partnerships before the tournament begins benefit from lower rates, more authentic content, and deeper athlete relationships that extend beyond the tournament window. OpenSponsorship's white-glove managed service handles sourcing, contracting, content briefing, delivery, and ROI reporting end to end.

Members of the press — download the full release:

Download the Press Release (PDF)
About OpenSponsorship

OpenSponsorship is the world's largest athlete marketing platform, connecting 25,000+ athletes and creators with brands across 160 sports and 120 countries. Launched in 2015, the company has facilitated over 9,000 accepted deals and 8,000+ successful brand-creator matches, giving it the largest proprietary dataset in athlete marketing. OpenSponsorship became profitable in 2024 and delivered 200% revenue growth in 2025. Ishveen Jolly, backed by investors Serena Williams and David Blitzer, is the Founder and CEO, winner of SBJ Game Changer 2025 and Forbes 30 Under 30. The 2026 State of Athlete and Influencer Marketing Report is available at opensponsorship.com.

Want to activate soccer creators before kickoff?

The best rates close when the tournament starts.

Book Now

###

June 11, 2026

Home LifePetsFood & DrinkAlcoholArtBikesBoatsCarsEating OutFashionFishingGolfJeweleryMoviesMusicShoesShoppingTravel

Pre-Packaged Projects

Social Media Deal

1 post & 1 story with the DeAndre Hopkins promoting your product.

$15,000
Estimated Price
Sign up to start an offer

Brand Ambassador Deal

Long-term deal involving appearances, photoshoots, social media and more.

$135,000
Estimated Price
Sign up to start an offer

Appearance Deal

Have DeAndre Hopkins make a live appearance at your next event

$22,500
Estimated Price
Sign up to start an offer

Custom

Need help on a custom package for this athlete?

Login to request help

Frequently asked questions

Brands can sponsor DeAndre Hopkins on OpenSponsorship by creating a free account, browsing DeAndre Hopkins's profile, and sending a sponsorship proposal for social posts, appearances, or integrated campaigns. OpenSponsorship handles messaging, deliverables, and deal terms in one platform so you can connect directly with this athlete.

DeAndre Hopkins is listed on OpenSponsorship and available for brand sponsorships. Brands can review campaign packages, audience details, and pricing on this profile, then submit a proposal to start a partnership with this athlete.

According to OpenSponsorship, estimated pricing to sponsor DeAndre Hopkins starts at $15,000 for a social media post, $22,500 for a appearance and $135,000 for a brand ambassador campaign. Final rates depend on deliverables, usage rights, and campaign scope. Sign up on OpenSponsorship to view packages and send a proposal.

According to OpenSponsorship, DeAndre Hopkins's audience includes 659K+ Instagram followers, interests including Home Life, Pets, Food & Drink, Alcohol, Art, and more, based in Kansas City, Missouri, United States. Brands can use this profile to evaluate reach, content niche, and sponsorship fit before sending a proposal.

news article image

DeAndre Hopkins won't 'force' himself onto a team, still hopes to join contender - NFL.com

June 25, 2026

news article image

DeAndre Hopkins landing spots: Five-time Pro Bowler has interest in Joe Burrow and the Bengals - CBS Sports

May 5, 2026

news article image

DeAndre Hopkins Rumors: Which Teams Are In Mix To Sign Him? - Complex

May 29, 2026

news article image

DeAndre Hopkins on what's next for him and football: 'I still got a lot of ball left' - TigerNet

June 27, 2026

news article image

Final Drive: DeAndre Hopkins Endorses Ja'Kobi Lane - Baltimore Ravens

July 21, 2026

news article image

3 NFL contenders who could sign DeAndre Hopkins - The Big Lead

June 26, 2026

Related Profiles

  • Marlon Humphrey
  • Josh Norman
  • Devin & Jason McCourty
  • Quinnen Williams
  • DJ Johnson
  • David Pindell
  • Morgan Ellison
  • Torrey Smith
  • Mac Hereford
  • Jaylen Waddle
  • Xavier Mason
  • Chauncey Gardner-Johnson
  • Will Grier
  • Richie Murphy
  • MVP
  • Josh Metellus
  • Arik Armstead
  • James Cook
  • Josh Jacobs
  • Jameson Williams
  • JPA Football
  • Josh Gordon
  • Demarcus Lawrence
  • Michael Thomas
  • Patrick Peterson